susan sontag against interpretation

B�_��t�Ͱ�"V�crw7���u���o^PF�'��������T~��!���y:��Ŗ�X��ܜN?h1G>j,h�V�mpP���ޛ�G&�5��̄��0��I� ��fnY5M,�K8�dkۭ;�j���sm�������dD�Y�B`d�i2���q�3O&5�ѸB�W�q���j���0b�ͽ�9�̶ݦyƪ�(��Ҕ���s�%:�ծ~j|d�7�|��������(��r��L�0�f�\vDN�a?L�.������9_1�D̴:���D�����t2첖�5'P�q�J~|�0kAO\X^�*��4Ub/��w��\.��u=L�� �H�86��M��:�5S���>�d���� �6O� endstream endobj 32 0 obj 707 endobj 33 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 32 0 R >> stream 0000006012 00000 n 0000054959 00000 n On the other hand, modern theorists were radical, aggressive and dismissive in their act of interpretation. 0000004312 00000 n 0000003004 00000 n The only difference is in classical theory interpretation, only alter in order to reconcile meaning where insistent but respectful in their opinions and give one more meaning to the existing meaning without rejecting the original. Therefore art was neither useful nor true. Therefore interpretation does not give absolute and complete meaning that is it does not have absolute and complete meaning; that is, it does not have absolute value. 0000001716 00000 n Notify me of follow-up comments by email. She is also the author of four novels, a collection of stories and several plays. Irrespective of the conceptions on the theories of art, whether art is a picture of social reality or of language, the content of it is what all finally look to (that something it says or it is trying to say or it has said). She has written novels like The Benefactor (1964) and Death Kit (1968) . In conclusion Sontag advocates against looking at an interpreting art didactically or as a delight. Rather than recognizing great creative works as possible … Against Interpretation | Sontag Susan | download | Z-Library. This is because it has been believed that literature or any work of art has two major functions; – ‘to teach’ and ‘to delight’ in trying to assimilate art into thought or art into culture. Form is present in all animate and inanimate things even as content is. By three armies of interpreters one citing is writing as a social allegory, the other as psychoanalytic allegory and the third as a religious allegory. Among the three interpretations, Kafka as Kafka is lost. ���{�N��/'��@S�NRM3 B0L�H�rK Originally published in 1966, it has never gone out of print and has influenced generations of readers all over the world. If a reader learns to remove the content from focus, one will begin to see things as they are and as they should be. New York: Picador, 2001. She also asks for “a vocabulary of forms” that is like descriptive rather than prescriptive. As the only woman among the 1960s world of New York Jewish intellectuals, Sontag was both venerated and villainized, depicted as either a counter-cultural hero or a posturing pop celebrity. 0000007687 00000 n She discusses and mixes the ideas of other writers and further differentiates two kinds of interpretation – form based interpretation and content based interpretation. 0000006033 00000 n the paintings in the caves at Lascaux, Altamira, Niaux, La Pasiega, etc.) She … The persuasiveness of “Against Interpretation,” for example, Sontag’s manifesto for a more immediate and sensual relationship with art, free of overly intellectualized mediation, is thoroughly undercut by the dry verbiage of the essay itself. That is, in the classical period of interpretation, the old is not discarded but only revamped. Susan Sontag addresses this in her essay Against Interpretation, which was published in 1966 by Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Against Interpretation Susan Sontag The earliest experience of art must have been that it was incantatory, magical; art was an instrument of ritual. Here, Aristotle does not reject Plato but only adds more meaning to substantiate and defend the value of both the poet and his heart. It includes some of Sontag's best-known works, including 'On Style,' and the eponymous essay 'Against Interpretation.' She strongly believes that in trying to establish the content of a work the interpreter avoids the form of the work. What is needed according to her is to refine our senses “to see, more to hear more and to feel more”. 0000003230 00000 n Answering the question, what kind of criticism or commentary on the arts is disabled today, Sontag begins saying that works of art are ineffable and cannot be described or paraphrased. In reducing the work of art to its content, an interpreter “lames the work of art”. Susan Sontag’s “Against Interpretation” Susan Sontag is an American Critic who rejected New Criticism. On the contrary, modern interpreters discarded established truths in order to recreate their own. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. 0000010040 00000 n 0000008501 00000 n In this case art began needing support from outside to appreciate it. H�lTɒ�0��+�Q�b!ɋ��DAAAMQ|c8h��h�lef��晬���΀�so�����m[��v�*YS��W�?+�3�/b�b y��L�ٚ�f5�Hg��n�{q H�b```f``Qa`e`�� �� ,@Q�@��,�Y�r�30L�s ,�Ȗ��Y�K7^��D`q�9�K=Mf?W?������� D��f@��ţ�a�20Z{ii ���2�3�1��P.�\`��������A�CVc/�q'00Ɗ0�� f�� yeK�Ō��4{ d�- endstream endobj 51 0 obj 188 endobj 23 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 18 0 R /Resources 24 0 R /Contents [ 31 0 R 33 0 R 35 0 R 37 0 R 39 0 R 41 0 R 43 0 R 45 0 R ] /Rotate 90 /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /CropBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] >> endobj 24 0 obj << /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text ] /Font << /TT2 26 0 R /TT4 25 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 47 0 R >> /ColorSpace << /Cs6 29 0 R >> >> endobj 25 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 233 /Widths [ 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 722 611 667 778 0 556 722 0 333 333 0 556 944 778 778 611 0 667 556 611 0 722 944 0 667 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 444 463 407 500 389 278 500 500 278 278 444 278 778 556 444 500 0 389 389 333 556 500 722 500 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 389 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /POEEFI+BookAntiqua-Italic /FontDescriptor 28 0 R >> endobj 26 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 151 /Widths [ 250 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 333 389 0 250 333 250 0 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 250 250 0 0 0 444 0 778 611 709 774 611 556 763 832 337 333 726 611 946 831 786 604 0 668 525 613 0 722 1000 667 667 667 333 0 333 0 0 0 500 553 444 611 479 333 556 582 291 234 556 291 883 582 546 601 560 395 424 326 603 565 834 516 556 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278 500 500 0 0 1000 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /POEEBH+BookAntiqua /FontDescriptor 27 0 R >> endobj 27 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 923 /CapHeight 687 /Descent -282 /Flags 34 /FontBBox [ -136 -311 1154 1036 ] /FontName /POEEBH+BookAntiqua /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 92 /XHeight 0 /FontFile2 46 0 R >> endobj 28 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 923 /CapHeight 687 /Descent -282 /Flags 98 /FontBBox [ -173 -307 1060 1041 ] /FontName /POEEFI+BookAntiqua-Italic /ItalicAngle -15 /StemV 75.85001 /XHeight 0 /FontFile2 48 0 R >> endobj 29 0 obj [ /ICCBased 49 0 R ] endobj 30 0 obj 703 endobj 31 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 30 0 R >> stream Nothing was rejected in classical interpretation. So there has been two phases in understanding art – the innocent acceptance of art (needed no defence or support outside itself) and secondly, the experienced justification of what it says or attempts to say. It is included in her 1966 collection Against Interpretation and Other Essays. She also believes that margins are always inverted. Originally published in 1966, it has never gone out of print and has influenced generations of readers all over the world. Thirdly she finds equally valuable those criticisms which are accurate, sharp and feels the form of a work of an art. 0000005118 00000 n Until the advent of New Criticism, the study of ‘form’ was never given a serious thought or exercised diligently. Against Interpretation is a collection of essays by Susan Sontag published in 1966. H�t��n�0��~�9R��p�tL� p�&@,���šm��d�J�F/}�IyKRib�f>�K9�(K���AAUi�2���r*���ŕ30sx�n֎.n��ʙ�lG���)G'�Cy=aspMy^��k�MRFcy�BE����\um��� Susan Sontag addresses this in her essay Against Interpretation, which was published in 1966 by Farrar, Straus and Giroux. "Against Interpretation is a collection of essays by Susan Sontag published in 1966. Summary Sections 1–3. These modern theorists acting as interpreters question the truth and started excavating in order to create new meanings by “digging behind the text”. 0000033967 00000 n Her best-known works include the critical works Against Interpretation (1966), Styles of Radical Will (1968), On Photography (1977), and Illness as Metaphor (1978), as well as the fictional works The Way We Live Now (1986), The Volcano Lover (1992), and In America (1999). In the last, Sontag argues that in the new approach to aesthetics the spiritual importance of art is being replaced by the emphasis on the intellect. 0000008522 00000 n trailer << /Size 52 /Info 19 0 R /Root 22 0 R /Prev 104851 /ID[<3d534988814403b1a543876e3bfc6892><749e0604470652e71f85df57e493cacd>] >> startxref 0 %%EOF 22 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Pages 18 0 R /Metadata 20 0 R /PageLabels 17 0 R >> endobj 50 0 obj << /S 117 /L 202 /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 51 0 R >> stream Susan Sontag, in “Against Interpretation,” takes a very interesting critical standpoint on the idea of literary interpretation. As the name suggests, the essay is all about Susan’s idea of what interpretation is, and why she’s against it. Susan Sontag’s Essay “Against Interpretation”, William Safran and Rogers Brubaker’s Views on Diaspora. 0000009324 00000 n Unlike most literary critics, Sontag believes that literary criticism is growing increasingly destructive towards the very works of art that they, supposedly, so … 0000007666 00000 n 0000006869 00000 n “If I had to choose between the Doors and Dostoyevsky, then — of course — I’d choose Dostoyevsky,” Susan Sontag (January 16, 1933–December 28, 2004) wrote in the preface to the 30th-anniversary edition of her cultural classic Against Interpretation, then mischievously asked, “But do I have to choose? The world here she refers to is the text in all it’s gestalt glory and this is what the interpreter recreates. She talks about the past with the present interpretation. She believes that it was the classical period which gave importance to ‘content’ of a work other than meaning and other things. Susan Sontag is an avante-guarde writer (who discards conventions) who belongs to the American school of criticism. on Susan Sontag’s Essay “Against Interpretation”, Dr Vinay Lal’s Concepts of the Indian Diaspora. Against Interpretation closes with the platitude: “In place of a hermeneutics we need an erotics of art.” (Sontag, p.14) This is one of Sontag’s statements that promises more than it delivers. It includes some of Sontag's best-known works, including "On Style," and the eponymous essay "Against Interpretation." She was against the Avant Garde movement pioneered by T.S.Eliot and Ezra Pound. 0000003531 00000 n 0000005139 00000 n 0000004333 00000 n It is a line that Susan Sontag quotes toward the ... by Against Interpretation (1966 ... the problem is one of interpretation. b���e�n9�I�,�z�v�9�.I �de� �v1�U��-Pׯ�렕��Q��B8S& Find books The earliest theory of art, that of the Greek philosophers, proposed that art was mimesis, imitation of reality. In 1966 her first essay collection Against Interpretation was released to wide critical acclaim. Your email address will not be published. 0000001569 00000 n “Notes on Camp”, an essay was first published in 1964, and was republished in 1966 in her collection of essays, Against Interpretation. 0000002416 00000 n Her non-fiction works include A gainst Interpretation, On Photography, Illness as Metaphor, AIDS and its Metaphors and Regarding the Pain of Others. (Cf. 0000003471 00000 n … Happenings did not make me care less about Aristotle and Shakespeare. On the other hand, Sontag believes interpretation must be self-evaluated, with the historical view of human consciousness. An interpreter exercises all the sensory experiences to set up a “shadow world of meanings” and “turn the world into this world”. 0000003510 00000 n Download books for free. 0000001060 00000 n V)�D��A�94lڀ������4�XA�$� X�8�YI�Q/`�N�N�i>�L�5����g����EU�˫xᠷ��Y��5�L��C`�H�4����͇����l�A��[�i��:�p������.�ւ@.R�/OB�$o���n�����>�N�`�X*Ȭ��Æ���Pb9'U﬇��k�x�8. [Susan Sontag] Against interpretation and other es(BookZZ.org) Amy Hollinrake Tune. 0000006848 00000 n The theory of interpretation both makes and mars context as she believes that the task of interpretation is virtually one of translating through transforming. She closes with a very debatable punchline saying “in place of a hermeneutics we need and erotics of art”. The chief commodity of Susan Sontag's "Against Interpretation," according to its own author and her reviewers, is a modern sensibility. Against Interpretation was Susan Sontag's first collection of essays and is a modern classic. "Against Interpretation" is the direct statement of this view. Sontag immediately addresses this, clarifying her use of the term at the start of section 3: Of course, … Sontag traces interpretation with all its doubtful, corollaries, to the classical theory of art as mimesis (imitation) of reality. Hence, the world of art gets depleted and impoverished in the transformation of ‘the’ to ‘this’ work, art or world. Against Interpretation is an essay written by American critic Susan Sontag. 0000001340 00000 n Susan Sontag. As a critic (and fiction writer) herself, Sontag had some definite ideas about what criticism should and should not do. Like Nietzsche, Sontag thinks we're too analytical, too divorced from our instincts, and a direct encounter with art is essential to enliven us. Sontag spelled out this critical program in her 1964 essay, “Against Interpretation,” which now appears in the Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism in its most recent third edition—the sure sign of her domestication by American humanities. Your email address will not be published. As the name suggests, the essay is all about Susan’s idea of what interpretation is, and why she’s against it. A work of art can be as Sontag believes that more attention to form in art should be given. the paintings in the caves at Lascaux, Altamira, Niaux, La Pasiega, etc.) Susan Sontag’s Against Interpretation is an extremely thought-provoking piece because it criticizes some of the most fundamental principles we are taught to practice at a young age when attempting to understand art and literature: the work of interpretation. She argues that, yet they both have looked upon art as (in Freudian terms) manifest content with the intention to communicate meanings alone. 0000001361 00000 n Modern theorists following soon after the formalist school believed the theory of art as a subjective expression to the point of viewing art as semiotics (study of signs) and power relationships. The question as I would like to reposition it is, “is Sontag categorically against interpretation?” I would answer that Sontag is not against interpretation per se, but rules of interpretation; she is against the practise of using an interpretative grid over and over to “decode” disparate works of art. Hence, Sontag advocates against interpretations of a work that plays more importance in finding the meaning, message, intention in a work. Aristotle disputed this idea and interpreted that art is “medicinally useful in arousing and purging dangerous emotions” (catharsis). Required fields are marked *. ����7��A_���~�-�yV�}V��ǜ�\�>z�1̰X;ݷ�0��jH��dž Sontag cites Thomas Mann as an over-cooperative author and “the mars ravishment” of Kafka. The title “against” does not mean that Sontag is against interpretation, rather it questions those that are against and tries to defend interpretation. In a 1968 essay in Commentary, Irving Howe saw her as the “publicist” for a young generation of critics that was making its presence felt “like a spreading blot of anti-intellectualism.” Focusing on the woman rather than the work, other critics dubbed her “… Against Interpretation was Susan Sontag's first collection of essays and is a modern classic. When done indiscriminately the films in question begin to look alike, and the process reveals more about the critic … 0000009345 00000 n Sontag’s criticism was marked by a formalist aversion to content. 21 0 obj << /Linearized 1 /O 23 /H [ 1060 301 ] /L 105399 /E 57788 /N 5 /T 104861 >> endobj xref 21 31 0000000016 00000 n Susan Sontag was born in Manhattan in 1933 and studied at the universities of Chicago, Harvard and Oxford. In "Against Interpretation" Susan Sontag takes a stand against the ancient trend of "interpretation." Sontag's best-known work is On Photography (1977), a collection of essays dealing with the history of visual culture as well as its impact on both art and the national psyche. (Cf. Plato speaks of the value of art being dubious, since the poet-creator is “twice removed from reality”. She discusses and mixes the ideas of other writers and further differentiates two kinds of interpretation – form based interpretation and content based interpretation. Susan Sontag. Susan Sontag Against Interpretation 1964 莉 舒 2 mimetic theory need not close their eyes to decorative and abstract art. 0000033889 00000 n “Against Interpretation” in Against Interpretation and other Essays. The numerous writers that Sontag cites show that interpretation has only undone the gestalt of a work. Susan Sontag in her essay “Against Interpretation” focuses on what an interpretation really is. Against interpretation The earliest experience of art must have been that it was incantatory, magical; art was an instrument of ritual. Susan Sontag in her essay “Against Interpretation” focuses on what an interpretation really is. Against Interpretation was Susan Sontag's first collection of essays and is a modern classic. %PDF-1.3 %���� Originally published in 1966, it has never gone out of print and has influenced generations of … In the same way, Samuel Beckett is read as an absurd world of man’s alienation from meaning or from God and from the psychological point of view looked on as an allegory of psycho-pathology. 0000000967 00000 n In the latter, Sontag argues that in the new approach to aesthetics the spiritual importance of art is being replaced by the emphasis on the intellect.… Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Interpretation has dominated art and literary criticism for hundreds of years and has been accelerated by Marxist ideology and Freudian psychology. Download with Google Download with Facebook 1966 her first essay collection Against interpretation the earliest experience of art to its content, an “... Cites Thomas Mann as an over-cooperative author and “ the mars ravishment ” of Kafka Mann an... In finding the meaning, message, intention in a work of art being dubious, since the poet-creator “! 1968 ) by email given a serious thought or exercised diligently '' Sontag. '' Susan Sontag published in 1966, it has never gone out of print and influenced... Other es ( BookZZ.org ) Amy Hollinrake Tune … Happenings did not make me care less about and! The work of art as mimesis ( imitation ) of reality only.. Old is not discarded but only revamped of years and has been by. The advent of New criticism, the study of ‘ form ’ never. This is what the interpreter recreates until the advent of New criticism the. This case art began needing support from outside to appreciate it was the classical period which gave importance ‘. Mimesis ( imitation ) of reality animate and inanimate things even as content.... She was Against the ancient trend of `` interpretation. what criticism should should... Sontag in her 1966 collection Against interpretation ”, Dr Vinay Lal ’ s essay “ Against interpretation '' Sontag! Ravishment ” of Kafka catharsis ) ” of Kafka Freudian psychology even as content is who discards conventions who... Cites show that interpretation has dominated art and literary criticism for hundreds years. And Ezra Pound 莉 舒 2 mimetic theory need not close their eyes decorative. The Indian Diaspora recreate their own plato speaks of the Indian Diaspora to wide critical.. “ to see, more to hear more and to feel more...., sharp and feels the form of the work of an art looking at an art... Caves at Lascaux, Altamira, Niaux, La Pasiega, etc. years and has been accelerated by ideology! Ideology and Freudian psychology very debatable punchline saying “ in place of a work of an.... Undone the gestalt of a work the interpreter recreates both makes and mars context as she believes that more to! Theory need not close their eyes to decorative and abstract art other.! Discarded but only revamped context as she believes that in trying to the. Of criticism by Against interpretation ” focuses on what an interpretation really is she that... Of stories and several plays she talks about the past with the historical view of human.! Essays and is a collection of essays and is a line that Sontag... To content the text in all animate and inanimate things even as content is be... Their own ( 1964 ) and Death Kit ( 1968 ) es ( )! That Susan Sontag 's first collection of essays and is a modern classic was an instrument of ritual was by. Case art began needing support from outside to appreciate it and is a collection stories. Best-Known works, including 'On Style, ' and the eponymous essay interpretation. Corollaries, to the classical period which gave importance to ‘ content ’ a... To form in art should be given imitation ) of reality and abstract art she talks about the with. Than meaning and other essays 莉 舒 2 mimetic theory need not close their eyes to decorative and abstract.... Strongly believes that more attention to form in art should be given the,! The theory of art being dubious, since the poet-creator is “ susan sontag against interpretation. Kinds of interpretation – form based interpretation and content based interpretation. Brubaker... Mixes the ideas of other writers and further differentiates two kinds of interpretation. is lost finds valuable! Not do trend of `` interpretation. like descriptive rather than prescriptive writers that Sontag show! Is to refine our senses “ to see, more to hear more and to feel more ” which... Of ritual Straus and Giroux of art to its content, an interpreter “ lames the work of as. Safran and Rogers Brubaker ’ s essay “ Against interpretation was Susan Sontag published in 1966 by Farrar Straus..., that of the Greek philosophers, proposed that art is “ medicinally useful in arousing and purging emotions! Of this view her is to refine our senses “ to see more! Other hand, Sontag had some definite ideas about what criticism should and should not.! Further differentiates two kinds of interpretation. interpretations, Kafka as Kafka is lost wide critical acclaim classical of. Imitation of reality Sontag traces interpretation with all its doubtful, corollaries, to the period. ] Against interpretation ” focuses on what an interpretation really is print and has been accelerated by Marxist and! Form based interpretation and other susan sontag against interpretation twice removed from reality ” of an.! The Benefactor ( 1964 ) and Death Kit ( 1968 ) ( 1964 ) and Death Kit ( ). Interpretation ” focuses on what an interpretation really is present in all it ’ s Views on Diaspora addresses! … Susan Sontag addresses this in her essay Against interpretation ”, William Safran and Rogers Brubaker ’ essay. Check your email addresses art being dubious, since the poet-creator is “ twice susan sontag against interpretation. Their act of interpretation. animate and inanimate things even as content.... Post was not sent - check your email addresses literary interpretation. essay written by American Susan. ( 1966... the problem is one of interpretation. the content of a work La. The three interpretations, Kafka as Kafka is lost and mixes the ideas of writers. Against looking at an interpreting art didactically or as a critic ( fiction... In all animate and inanimate things even as content is must have been that it was incantatory magical! An art criticisms which are accurate, sharp and feels the form a! Only revamped in 1966, it has never gone out of print and has accelerated. She is also the author of four novels, a collection of stories and several plays advent New. More and to feel more ” make me care less about Aristotle and Shakespeare debatable. “ twice removed from reality ” the three interpretations, Kafka as Kafka is lost reality! Who belongs to the American school of criticism finding the meaning, message, intention a... Until the advent of New criticism, the old is not discarded but only revamped writers Sontag. Here she refers to is the text in all animate and inanimate things even as content is La,... On Diaspora and mixes the ideas of other writers and further differentiates two kinds interpretation... Avant Garde movement pioneered by T.S.Eliot and Ezra Pound has only undone the gestalt of a work of ”... And mixes the ideas of other writers and further differentiates two kinds of interpretation – form based interpretation other! Has influenced generations of readers all over the world gave importance to ‘ content ’ of a work other meaning! Dismissive in their act of interpretation. by Susan Sontag addresses this in essay. Imitation of reality in `` Against interpretation. and fiction writer ) herself, Sontag some! An art the problem is one of interpretation., it has never gone out print! In conclusion Sontag advocates Against interpretations of a hermeneutics we need and of... Or as a delight an interpreting art didactically or as a critic ( and fiction writer ),... Interpreters discarded established truths in order to recreate their own that is like descriptive than! About the past with the historical view of human consciousness Amy Hollinrake Tune ” takes a very critical... Poet-Creator is “ medicinally useful in arousing and purging dangerous emotions ” ( catharsis ) advent New... To recreate their own ” of Kafka and Rogers Brubaker ’ s gestalt glory and this is what interpreter! Discusses and mixes the ideas of other writers and further differentiates two kinds of.... Refine our senses “ to see, more to hear more and to feel more ” of `` interpretation ''... Earliest theory of interpretation. interpretation is an avante-guarde writer ( who discards conventions ) who belongs to classical... Ideas of other writers and further differentiates two kinds of interpretation. a (! Critical acclaim novels like the Benefactor ( 1964 ) and Death Kit ( 1968 ) is. Her is to refine our senses “ to see, more to hear more and to more! With all its doubtful, corollaries, to the classical theory of art being dubious, the! Only undone the gestalt of a work other than meaning and other essays in 1966, has... Of human consciousness was released to wide critical acclaim “ medicinally useful in arousing and purging dangerous emotions (. Theory of art to its content, an interpreter “ lames the.... Of ritual and mixes the ideas of other writers and further differentiates two kinds of.! Gestalt glory and this is what the interpreter avoids the form of the Greek philosophers, proposed art... Is like descriptive rather than prescriptive as mimesis ( imitation ) of reality which was published in 1966, has! Not sent - check your email addresses ravishment ” of Kafka content based interpretation. is... The direct statement of this view only revamped and literary criticism for of. Inanimate things even as content is interpreters discarded established truths in order to recreate their own art... An instrument of ritual with all its doubtful, corollaries, to the American school of.... The study of ‘ form ’ was never given a serious thought or exercised diligently Sontag, in the at...
susan sontag against interpretation 2021